Jan 31, 2011 · Having seen both, I think the 2010 version is superior in almost every respect... however, the 1969 version did give us a little more backstory ...
People also ask
Is the True Grit remake better than the original?
Is True Grit 2010 worth watching?
Is True Grit 2010 historically accurate?
Which True Grit movie is closer to the book?
Jan 28, 2011 · This may be blasphemous to some, but yes The Coen Brothers version of "True Grit" is better than Henry Hathaway's. It was shot better, scripted ...
May 3, 2023 · In our first ever "Watch with History", we compare the 1969 and 2010 versions of the movie "True Grit." While the 2010 version has better ...
Duration: 8:14
Posted: Aug 25, 2019
Posted: Aug 25, 2019
Sep 6, 2014 · I personally liked both. The original is always great but the new version is more correct in as far as how things may have turned out like the ...
Dec 17, 2010 · While the Duke's portrayal is laudable, the screenplay was hastily written, and some of the other primary roles were poorly cast.
Sep 3, 2023 · The 1969 adaptation made Cogburn the lead character so the movie could be a starring vehicle for Wayne, but the 2010 remake remained truer to ...
The 2010 was nominated for 10 oscars and did not win one but it was very worthy of several.Jeff Bridges was more realistic,and gruffy.The 1969 was more engaging ...
Feb 16, 2015 · I don't know what it says about 1969 vs. 2010, but it says something about Henry Hathaway who worked his butt off directing 67 movies but almost ...
Duration: 0:41
Posted: Jan 4, 2024
Posted: Jan 4, 2024